Quick Answer
E10 typically delivers 1-3% lower fuel economy compared to E5 due to ethanol’s lower energy content. Ethanol contains approximately 33% less energy per litre than petrol meaning more fuel is needed to travel the same distance. However this difference is minimal in real-world driving and the environmental benefits of higher ethanol content often outweigh the slight reduction in miles per gallon for most drivers.
Expanded Answer (Simplified)
The fuel economy difference between E10 and E5 is primarily due to the energy content difference between ethanol and conventional petrol, though the real-world impact is relatively small for most drivers.
Energy Content Comparison:
Ethanol vs Petrol: Ethanol contains about 21.1 MJ per litre while conventional petrol contains about 32.4 MJ per litre. This means ethanol has roughly 33% less energy per unit volume than petrol.
Fuel Blend Impact: Since E10 contains twice as much ethanol as E5 (10% vs 5%), it has a correspondingly lower overall energy content, requiring slightly more fuel to travel the same distance.
Real-World Fuel Economy:
Typical Reduction: Most drivers experience a 1-3% reduction in fuel economy when switching from E5 to E10. This translates to roughly 1-2 miles less per gallon for an average car.
Driving Conditions: The difference may be more noticeable in city driving where fuel consumption is higher, while highway driving may show minimal difference.
Vehicle Factors: Modern vehicles with advanced engine management systems may show smaller differences as they can optimize for ethanol content.
Cost Considerations:
Pump Price Advantage: E10 is typically 1-2 pence per litre cheaper than E5, which can offset much of the fuel economy difference.
Overall Value: For many drivers, the lower purchase price of E10 combined with its environmental benefits makes it the more attractive option despite slightly higher consumption.
Expanded Answer (Technical)
The fuel economy differential between E10 and E5 results from fundamental thermodynamic properties of ethanol versus gasoline, with quantifiable impacts on volumetric fuel consumption and thermal efficiency.
Thermodynamic Analysis
Energy density differences create measurable fuel consumption variations:
Lower Heating Value (LHV) Comparison:
- Gasoline LHV: 32.4 MJ/L (43.4 MJ/kg)
- Ethanol LHV: 21.1 MJ/L (26.8 MJ/kg)
- E5 Blend LHV: ~31.8 MJ/L (1.9% reduction vs. gasoline)
- E10 Blend LHV: ~31.3 MJ/L (3.4% reduction vs. gasoline)
Stoichiometric Fuel Requirements:
- E5 Air-Fuel Ratio: 14.6:1 (mass basis)
- E10 Air-Fuel Ratio: 14.1:1 (mass basis)
- Fuel Flow Increase: E10 requires ~3.5% higher mass flow rate than E5
- Volumetric Flow: E10 requires ~1.5% higher volumetric flow than E5
Engine Performance and Efficiency Factors
Multiple factors influence the actual fuel economy difference beyond simple energy content:
Combustion Efficiency Effects:
- Oxygen Content: Higher oxygen in E10 (3.7% vs 1.8% in E5) improves combustion completeness
- Flame Speed: Faster flame propagation in E10 can improve thermal efficiency by 1-2%
- Knock Resistance: Higher octane allows advanced timing, partially offsetting energy density loss
- Charge Cooling: Ethanol’s high heat of vaporization provides charge cooling benefits
Engine Management Adaptations:
- Fuel Trim Compensation: ECU adjusts fuel delivery based on oxygen sensor feedback
- Ignition Timing: Optimal timing maps for ethanol content can recover 0.5-1% efficiency
- Variable Valve Timing: Advanced systems optimize valve timing for ethanol blends
Real-World Fuel Economy Testing
Standardized testing protocols quantify actual fuel economy differences:
EPA Testing Results:
- City Driving: E10 shows 2-4% higher consumption vs. E5
- Highway Driving: E10 shows 1-2% higher consumption vs. E5
- Combined Cycle: Average 1.5-3% increase in fuel consumption
- Vehicle Variation: Results vary by engine design, compression ratio, and management system
European WLTP Data:
- Passenger Cars: 1-2% average fuel consumption increase with E10 vs. E5
- Light Commercial Vehicles: 1.5-2.5% increase depending on engine technology
- Hybrid Vehicles: Minimal difference due to electric assist compensation